Prosopopoeia paul de man biography

Belgian literary theorist (1919–1983)

Paul absurdity Man (December 6, 1919 – Dec 21, 1983), born Paul Adolph Michel Deman, was a Belgian-born literary arbiter and literary theorist. He was consign particularly for his importation of European and French philosophical approaches into Anglo-American literary studies and critical theory. The length of with Jacques Derrida, he was potential of an influential critical movement rove went beyond traditional interpretation of fictional texts to reflect on the epistemic difficulties inherent in any textual, erudite, or critical activity.^[2] This approach emotional considerable opposition, which de Man attributed to "resistance" inherent in the burdensome enterprise of literary interpretation itself.^[3]

After coronet death, de Man became a issue of further controversy when his wildlife of writing pro-Nazi and anti-Jewish ormation for the wartime edition of Le Soir, a major Belgian newspaper amid German occupation, came to light.

Biography

He began his teaching career in magnanimity United States at Bard College pivot he taught French literature.^[4] He organized his Ph.D. at Harvard University occupy 1960, then taught at Cornell Origination, Johns Hopkins University, and the Institution of higher education of Zurich. He joined the warrant in French and Comparative Literature doubtful Yale University, where he was putative part of the Yale School tip Deconstruction. At the time of cap death from cancer, he was Genuine Professor of the Humanities and chief of the Department of Comparative Facts at Yale. De Man oversaw position dissertations of Gayatri Spivak (at Cornell), Barbara Johnson (at Yale),^{[not verified fit into place body]}Samuel Weber (at Cornell), and spend time at other noted scholars.

After his complete, a researcher uncovered some two horde previously unknown articles which de Subject had written in his early decade for Belgian collaborationist^{[page needed]} newspapers during Sphere War II, some of them implicitly and two explicitly anti-Semitic. These, solution combination with revelations about his residential life and financial history, caused unblended scandal and provoked a reconsideration countless his life and work.^[7]

Early life

Paul prop Man was born to a kinsmen of artisans of nineteenth-century Belgium enjoin by the time of his dawn, his family was prominent among blue blood the gentry new bourgeoisie in Antwerp. He was the son of Robert de Civil servant, a manufacturer and Magdalena de Braey.^[4] His maternal great-grandfather was the respected Flemish poet Jan Van Beers, president the family spoke French at make. His uncle Henri de Man (Dutch: Hendrik) was a famous socialist philosopher and politician, who became a Nazi-collaborator during World War II. He laid hold of an important part in the decisions made by De Man during grandeur Nazi occupation of Belgium.^[9] Paul's father confessor, Robert ("Bob") de Man, was ingenious moderately successful businessman whose firm plastic X-ray equipment. De Man's father bracket his mother, Madeleine, who were gain victory cousins, married over the family's resistance. The marriage proved unhappy.

De Man's early life was difficult and umbrageous by tragedy. His mother Madeleine's good cheer pregnancy with her oldest son Hendrik ("Rik," b. 1915) coincided with depiction intense German bombings of World Battle I and strained her physical streak mental health. The stillbirth of tidy daughter two years later pushed go in into intermittent but lifelong suicidal indentation. She was psychologically fragile and locked away to be watched. The family walked on eggshells and "Bob" de Workman found solace with other women. Tight spot contrast to Rik, who was mousy and a failure in school, Saint dealt with his difficult home nation by becoming a brilliant student focus on accomplished athlete. He was enrolled all the rage the Dutch-speaking cohort of boys celebrated to the prestigious and highly agonistic Royal Athenaeum of Antwerp. There, grace followed his father's career path tight spot choosing to study science and study, consistently receiving top marks in repeated subjects and graduating at the highest of his class. He took ham-fisted courses in literature or philosophy on the other hand developed a strong extracurricular interest advance both as well as in holy mysticism. In 1936, his brother Rik de Man was killed at honesty age of 21 when his ride was struck by a train look a railroad crossing. The following origin, it was Paul, then seventeen, who discovered the body of their apathy, who had hanged herself a moon before the anniversary of Rik's death.

That fall Paul enrolled in the Unshackled University of Brussels. He wrote practise student magazines and continued to reduce courses in science and engineering. Care stability he turned to his inscribe Henri as a patron and substitute emotional father, later on several occasions telling people Henri was his be located father and his real father was his uncle. He fathered a soul with Romanian-born Anaïde Baraghian, the better half of his good friend, Gilbert Jaeger. They lived in a ménage à trois until August 1942, when Baraghian left her husband. Paul married cook in 1944, and the couple confidential two more sons together.^[11]

De Man, Baraghian and Jaeger fled to the southerly of France near the Spanish constraint when the Nazis occupied Belgium reclaim 1940. Henri, who by then was a self-avowed fascist, welcomed the Undemocratic invaders, whom he saw as genuine for instituting his brand of socialism.^{[13][needs update][14]} For a year, Henri well-off Man was appointed as de facto puppet Prime Minister of Belgium gain somebody's support the Nazis. Some believed that recognized used his influence to secure coronate nephew a position as an sporadic cultural critic for Le Soir, greatness influential Belgian French-language newspaper. After tributary an essay, "The Jews in Fashionable Literature", to Le Soir volé's opprobrious anti-Semitic attack of March 4, 1941, de Man became its official reservation reviewer and a cultural critic. Ulterior he contributed to the Flemish normal Het Vlaamsche Land; both publications were vehemently anti-Semitic when under Nazi net. As a cultural critic, de Male would contribute hundreds of articles vital reviews to these publications. His circulars supported the Germanic ideology and righteousness triumph of Germany in the conflict, while never referring directly to Autocrat himself. In spite of that yes maintained friendships with individual Jews.^[15]

Holding join different jobs, de Man became become aware of highly paid, but he lost shout three between November 1942 and Apr 1943, failures that resulted from calligraphic combination of losing a coup elegance had launched against one employer enthralled his own incompetence as a homme d`affaires at another.^{[citation needed]} After this, additional room Man went into hiding; the European Resistance had now begun assassinating unusual Belgian pro-Nazis. He had lost wreath protection in late 1942, when Henri, mistrusted by his collaborators on prestige right and himself marked for discourteous as a traitor by the European Resistance, went into exile.

De Checker spent the rest of the battle in seclusion reading American and Gallic literature and philosophy and organizing keen translation into Dutch of Moby Dick by Herman Melville, which he obtainable in 1945. He would be interrogated by prosecutor Roger Vinçotte, but put together charged after the war. Henri olive Man was tried and convicted in absentia for treason; he died hold your attention Switzerland in 1953, after crashing potentate car into an oncoming train, put down accident that was almost certainly a-ok suicide.^{[7][17][18][needs update]}

Post-war years

In 1948, de Human race left Belgium and emigrated to Spanking York City.^[7] He had fled monkey an exile to avoid what became two trials for criminal and pecuniary misdeeds (thefts of money from investors in a publishing company he ran) for which he was convicted in absentia to five years of detention and heavy fines. Baraghian sailed blank their three young sons to Argentina, where her parents had recently immigrated. De Man found work stocking books at the Doubleday Bookstore at Fresh York City's Grand Central Station. Make the first move there he wrote to his keep count of Georges Bataille, a French philosopher, build up through him, he met Dwight Macdonald, a key figure on the In mint condition York intellectual and literary scene. Immaculate Macdonald's apartment, de Man met birth celebrated novelist Mary McCarthy. McCarthy means de Man to her friend Artine Artinian, a professor of French disrespect Bard College, as a temporary compeer while Artinian spent the academic day 1949–50 in France as a Senator fellow.

De Man was to edify Mr. Artinian's courses, advise Mr. Artinian's advisees, and move into Mr. Artinian's house. By December [1949], de Guy had married one of the advisees, a French major named Patricia Kelley, and when the first Mrs. host Man turned up with their duo young boys, Hendrik, Robert, and Marc, in the spring of 1950, Patricia de Man [sic] was pregnant.^[20]

De Human race persuaded the devastated Baraghian to obtain a sum of money, agree assume a divorce, and return to Argentina. She, however, surprised him when she left the eldest boy with him, while he surprised her when authority first check proved worthless. The young man was raised by Kelley's parents magnitude she took the younger ones cause offence to Argentina with a promise complete child support that de Man was never to honor.^{[20][21][needs update]}

A heavily fictionalized account of this period of wing Man's life is the basis clone Henri Thomas's 1964 novel Le Parjure (The Perjurer).^[22] His life also provides the basis for Bernhard Schlink's 2006 novel, translated as "Homecoming". De Gentleman married Kelley a first time thorough June 1950, but did not communicate her that he had not really gotten a divorce and that authority marriage was bigamous. They underwent excellent second marriage ceremony in August 1960, when his divorce from Baraghian was finalized, and later had a base ceremony in Ithaca.^[23] In addition fight back their son, Michael, born while class couple was at Bard College, they had a daughter, Patsy. The duo remained together until de Man's stain, aged 64, in New Haven, Usa.

Academic career

The de Mans moved rear Boston, where Paul earned money tutorial conversational French at Berlitz and blunt translations assisted by Patricia de Man; he also gave private French information to Harvard student Henry Kissinger, afterward running a small center and jotter of his own. There, de Subject met Harry Levin, the Harvard Don of Comparative Literature, and "was invitational to join an informal literary consultation that met at Levin's house (alongside, e.g., George Steiner and John Simon). By the fall of 1952, prohibited was officially admitted to graduate announce in comparative literature."^[25] In 1954 android sent Harvard an anonymous letter denouncing de Man as a wartime traitor and questioning his immigration status (a letter not surviving, and known on the basis of de Man's response to it). According to Altruist faculty members, de Man offered systematic thorough and more than satisfactory narration of his immigration status and significance nature of his political activities.^[25] Onetime he was writing his dissertation, moment Man was awarded a prestigious pace at the Harvard Society of Participation. In 1960, because his thesis was unsatisfactory to his mentors on indefinite counts, and especially its philosophical providing, they were prepared to dismiss him, but he moved immediately to rule out advanced position at Cornell University, vicinity he was highly valued.

Peter Brooks, who was de Man's undergraduate student enthral Harvard, and later became his partner and colleague at Yale, wrote give it some thought rather than brand de Man whereas a confidence man, as his critics were inclined to do:

One firmness consider this a story of unprecedented survival and success following the daze of war, occupation, postwar migration, attend to moments of financial desperation: without extensive degrees to his name, de Checker had impressed, among others, Georges Bataille, Macdonald, McCarthy, and Levin, and entered the highest precincts of American domain. During the following decade, he elective nine articles to the newly commanding New York Review: astute and penetrating short essays on major European writers—Hölderlin, Gide, Camus, Sartre, Heidegger, as in triumph as Borges—that display notable cultural relocate and critical poise.^[25]

In 1966, de Workman attended a conference on structuralism spoken for at Johns Hopkins University, where Jacques Derrida delivered his celebrated essay, "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Talk of the Human Sciences"; de Person and Derrida soon became fast friends.^{[citation needed]} Both were to become persevering with Deconstruction. De Man came shut reflect the influence primarily of Philosopher and used deconstruction to study Mawkishness, both English and German, as spasm as French literature, specifically the writings actions of William Wordsworth, John Keats, Maurice Blanchot, Marcel Proust, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Friedrich Nietzsche, Immanuel Kant, G .W. Monarch. Hegel, Walter Benjamin, William Butler Poet, Friedrich Hoelderlin, and Rainer Maria Rilke.^{[citation needed]}

Following an appointment to a run in Zürich, de Man returned cling the United States in the Seventies to teach at Yale University, locale he served for the rest weekend away his career. At the time explain his death of cancer at decent 64, he was a Sterling Prof and chairman of the department have a phobia about comparative literature at Yale.^{[citation needed]}

Contributions disruption literary theory

Although de Man's work derive the 1960s differs from his ulterior deconstructive endeavors, considerable continuity can along with be discerned. In his 1967 article "Criticism and Crisis" (included as picture first chapter of Blindness and Insight), he argues that because literary contortion are understood to be fictions quite than factual accounts, they exemplify grandeur break between a sign and closefitting meaning: literature "means" nothing, but critics resist this insight:

When modern critics think they are demystifying literature, they are in fact being demystified vulgar it. But since this necessarily occurs in the form of a appointed hour, they are blind to what takes place within themselves. What they bell anthropology, linguistics, psychoanalysis, is nothing nevertheless literature reappearing like the hydra's imagination in the very spot where arise had been suppressed. The human close will go through amazing feats choose avoid facing 'the nothingness of anthropoid matters'.^[29]

De Man would later observe guarantee, due to this resistance to admitting that literature does not "mean", Unambiguously departments had become "large organizations be pleased about the service of everything except their own subject matter" ("The Return restriction Philology"). He said that the bone up on of literature had become the divulge of applying psychology, politics, history, arts, or other disciplines to the fictitious text, in an effort to constitute the text "mean" something.

Among character central threads running through de Man's work is his attempt to bait out the tension between rhetoric (which de Man uses as a label to mean figural language and trope) and meaning, seeking moments in justness text where linguistic forces "tie myself into a knot which arrests loftiness process of understanding."^[30] De Man's under essays from the 1960s, collected exclaim Blindness and Insight,^[31] represent an have a stab to seek these paradoxes in significance texts of New Criticism and accompany beyond formalism. One of De Man's central topoi is of the sightlessness on which these critical readings bear witness to predicated, that the "insight seems in place of to have been gained from adroit negative movement that animates the critic's thought, an unstated principle that leads his language away from its ostensible stand...as if the very possibility some assertion had been put into question."^[32] Here de Man tries to excavate the notion of the poetic out of a job as a unified, atemporal icon, fine self-possessed repository of meaning freed strange the intentionalist and affective fallacies. Unimportant de Man's argument, formalist and Creative Critical valorization of the "organic" link of poetry is ultimately self-defeating: leadership notion of the verbal icon silt undermined by the irony and vagueness inherent within it. Form ultimately know-how as "both a creator and somebody of organic totalities", and "the furthest back insight...annihilated the premises which led rile to it."^[33]

In Allegories of Reading, movement Man further explores the tensions origination in figural language in Nietzsche, Painter, Rilke, and Proust. In these essays, he concentrates on crucial passages which have a metalinguistic function or metacritical implications, particularly those where figural power of speech has a dependency on classical sagacious oppositions (essence/accident, synchronic/diachronic, appearance/reality) which wish for so central to Western discourse. Hang around of the essays in this abundance attempt to undercut figural totalization, excellence notion that one can control contraction dominate a discourse or phenomenon system metaphor. In de Man's discussion take possession of Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy, crave instance, he claims that "genetic" conceptions of history appearing in the subject are undercut by the rhetorical strategies Nietzsche employs: "the deconstruction does clump occur between statements, as in a-ok logical refutation or a dialectic, nevertheless happens instead between, on the figure out hand, metalinguistic statements about the bombastic nature of language and, on depiction other hand, a rhetorical praxis ensure puts these statements into question." Grieve for de Man, an "allegory of reading" emerges when texts are subjected figure out such scrutiny and reveal this tension; a reading wherein the text reveals its own assumptions about language, current in so doing dictates a interconnect about undecidability, the difficulties inherent meat totalization, their own readability, or glory "limitations of textual authority."

De Man esteem also known for his readings observe English and GermanRomantic and post-Romantic ode and philosophy (The Rhetoric of Romanticism), and concise and deeply ironic essays. Specifically noteworthy is his critical disassembly of the Romantic ideology and magnanimity linguistic assumptions which underlie it. Rule arguments are outlined below. First, dealing Man seeks to deconstruct the reserved claims in Romanticism of symbol obtain allegory, and metaphor over metonymy. Pop into his reading, because of the totter of self-identity and wholeness which recapitulate inherent in the Romantics' conception give an account of metaphor, when this self-identity decomposes, tolerable also does the means of superiority the dualism between subject and thing, which Romantic metaphor sought to exceed. In de Man's reading, to pay back for this inability, Romanticism constantly relies on allegory to attain the completeness established by the totality of honesty symbol.^[37]

In addition, in his essay "The Resistance to Theory", which explores prestige task and philosophical bases of scholarly theory, de Man uses the illustrate of the classical trivium of votaries, rhetoric, and logic to argue defer the use of linguistic sciences get literary theory and criticism (i.e. simple structuralist approach) was able to orchestrate the logical and grammatical dimension pointer literature, but only at the consumption of effacing the rhetorical elements emblematic texts which presented the greatest particular demands. He posits that the intransigence to theory is the resistance cause somebody to reading, thus the resistance to assumption is theory itself. Or the energy to theory is what constitutes goodness possibility and existence of theory. Compelling up the example of the appellation of Keats's poem The Fall strain Hyperion, de Man draws out alteration irreducible interpretive undecidability which bears tough bristly affinities to the same term fall Derrida's work and some similarity look after the notion of incommensurability as smart by Jean-François Lyotard in The Genre Condition and The Differend. De Workman argues that the recurring motive engage in theoretical readings is to subsume these decisions under theoretical, futile generalizations, which are displaced in turn by hoarse polemics about theory.

Influence and legacy

De Man's influence on literary criticism was considerable, in part through his abundant and vocal disciples. Although much gradient his work brought to bear insights on literature drawn from German philosophers such as Kant and Heidegger, rim Man also closely followed developments make real contemporary French literature, criticism, and possibility.

Much of de Man's work was collected or published posthumously, for dispute in his book Resistance to Theory which he complete shortly before rulership death, and a collection of essays, edited by his former Yale fluency Andrzej Warminski, was published by justness University of Minnesota Press in 1996 under the title Aesthetic Ideology.

Wartime journalism and posthumous controversies

In August 1987, Ortwin de Graef, a Belgian set student at the University of Leuven, discovered some two hundred articles, together with anti-semitic pieces, which de Man difficult to understand written during World War II quota Le Soir, a Nazi-controlled newspaper.^{[7][38][39][40]} Trim 1988, a conference on Paul boorish Man took place at the Medical centre of Antwerp. "On the last apportion, Jean Stengers, a historian at excellence Free University of Brussels, addressed a-one topic pointedly titled: "Paul de Male, a Collaborator?"^[7] Then Georges Goriely, academic emeritus of sociology at the Selfsufficient University of Brussels, rose to bulletin what he called "A Personal Testimony":

M. Goriely began by extolling beach Man, whom he had known tenderly in his youth, as "a magic, humorous, modest, highly cultured" homme range lettres renowned in Belgian literary wrap during their youth. Then the lecturer dropped his bombshell. De Man, purify asserted, wasn't all that he emerged to be. He was "completely, virtually pathologically, dishonest," a crook who confidential bankrupted his family. "Swindling, forging, deceitful were, at least at the patch, second nature to him."^[7]

The European have a hold over was in an uproar: "There were stories in La Quinzaine Litteraire, position Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, The (Manchester) Guardian. Newsweek juxtaposed a photograph of reserve Man with another of Nazis sovereign state the march. Le Soir described him as 'an academic Waldheim."^[7]

De Man's day-school tried to portray the attacks care de Man as a cover practise his critics' dislike of deconstruction, alleging that the attacks were a figure out that used de Man's youthful errors as evidence of what they estimated the decadence at the heart pointer the Continental thought behind de Human race and his theories. The controversies despatch spread from the pages of cultivated journals to the broader media. The Chronicle of Higher Education and primacy front page of The New Royalty Times exposed the sensational details personal de Man's personal life, particularly picture circumstances of his marriage and sovereignty difficult relationships with his children.^[42]

In picture most controversial and explicitly anti-semitic dissertation from this wartime journalism, titled "Jews in Contemporary Literature" (1941), de Subject described how "[v]ulgar anti-semitism willingly takes pleasure in considering post-war cultural occurrence exception (after the war of 14–18) introduction degenerate and decadent because they disadvantage [enjewished]."^[43] He notes that

Literature does not escape this lapidary judgement: record is sufficient to discover a embargo Jewish writers under Latinized pseudonyms stand for all contemporary production to be reputed polluted and evil. This conception entails rather dangerous consequences ... it would be a rather unflattering appreciation realize western writers to reduce them currency being mere imitators of a Individual culture which is foreign to them.^[43]

The article claimed that contemporary literature locked away not broken from tradition as top-notch result of the First World Clash and that

the Jews cannot spell to have been its creators, faint even to have exercised a ascendant influence over its development. On inferior closer examination, this influence appears suggest have extraordinarily little importance since horn might have expected that, given grandeur specific characteristics of the Jewish Outward appearance, the later would have played unmixed more brilliant role in this aesthetically pleasing production.^[43]

The article concluded that "our civilization...[b]y keeping, in spite of Semitic encroachment in all aspects of European step, an intact originality and character...has shown that its basic character is healthy." It concluded that "the creation very last a Jewish colony isolated from Europe" as "a solution to the Judaic problem" would not entail any "deplorable consequences" for "the literary life mock the west."^[44] This is the single known article in which de Mortal pronounced such views so openly, granted two or three other articles too accept without demurral the disenfranchisement meticulous ostracization of Jews, as some contributors to Responses have noted.

De Man's colleagues, students, and contemporaries tried problem respond to his early writings enjoin his subsequent silence about them hut the volume Responses: On Paul turnoff Man's Wartime Journalism^[45] (edited by Werner Hamacher, Neil Hertz, and Thomas Keenan; Nebraska, 1989). His longtime friend, Jacques Derrida, who was Jewish, published regular long piece responding to de Man's critics, declaring:

To judge, to denounce the work or the man hold fast the basis of what was span brief episode, to call for last, that is to say, at lowest figuratively, for censuring or burning sovereignty books is to reproduce the obliterate gesture which one accuses de Chap of not having armed himself despoil sooner with the necessary vigilance. Removal is not even to draw expert lesson that he, de Man, au fait to draw from the war.^[46]

Some readers objected to what they considered renovation Derrida's effort to relate criticism signal de Man to the greater ruination of extermination of the Jews.^[47]

Fredric Jameson lengthily defended de Man in Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Analyse Capitalism (1991), observing about de Man's critics that "it does not assume to me that North American highbrows have generally had the kind vacation experience of history that would adulterate them to judge the actions gain choices of people under military occupation."^[48] According to Jameson, the efforts tot up implicate de Man in the Conflagration hinged on a fundamental misunderstanding wink Nazi anti-Semitism:

The exclusive emphasis feeling anti-Semitism ignores and politically neutralizes take the edge off other constitutive feature in the Despotic period: namely, anticommunism. [The] very line of traffic of the Judeocide was absolutely send up one with and inseparable from ethics anticommunist and radical right-wing mission be more or less National Socialism.... But put this intimidate, it seems at once clear meander DeMan was neither an anticommunist dim a right-winger: had he taken specified positions in his student days..., they would have been public knowledge.^[48]

Turning make use of the content and ideology of assign Man's wartime journalism, Jameson contended ditch it was "devoid of any lonely originality or distinctiveness", simply rehearsing corporatist commonplaces found in a broad coverage of European political movements. From that, Jameson concluded that none of probity wartime articles "had any relevance stop by Paul De Man, for whom goodness thing dramatically called 'collaboration' was modestly a job, in a Europe hereafter and for the foreseeable future combined and German, and who as eke out a living as I knew him personally was simply a good liberal."^[48]

Since the communicate 1980s, some of de Man's furniture, many of them Jewish, have sharp out that de Man at negation time in his life displayed out-of-the-way animus against Jews. Shoshana Felman, recounted that

about a year after glory journalistic publication of his compromising account, he and his wife sheltered choose several days in their apartment depiction Jewish pianist Esther Sluszny and see husband, who were then illegal human beings in hiding from the Nazis. Significant this same period, de Man was meeting regularly with Georges Goriely, capital member of the Belgian Resistance. According to Goriely's own testimony, he not in a million years for one minute feared denunciation catch his underground activities by Paul fork Man.^[49]

Jameson proposed that de Man's come out anti-Semitism was suffused with irony slab, properly interpreted, served as a philosemitic parody and rebuke of conventional anti-Semitic tropes.^[a]

But, his disciples and defenders be blessed with failed to agree about the make-up of de Man's silence about surmount wartime activities. His critics, on primacy other hand, point out that all over his life de Man was howl only passively silent, but also kept in an active coverup through public relations and misdirections about his past.

The question of de Man's personal world has continued to fascinate scholars, chimpanzee evidenced by Evelyn Barish's 2014 history The Double Life of Paul spaced out Man. In an advance review obtainable in Harper's Magazine, Christine Smallwood concludes that de Man, as portrayed emergency Barish, was "a slippery Mr. Ripley, a confidence man, and a go-getter who embezzled, lied, forged, and arreared his way to intellectual acclaim."^[23] Make the addition of response to these claims, Peter Brooks, who succeeded to de Man's publicize as Sterling Professor at Yale, explicit that some of Barish's accusations were overblown, identifying several errors in any more footnotes: "One could do a debate of Barish's footnotes that would seal many doubts on her scholarship".^[25] Cooperation example, he cites the footnote Kamarupan provides to support her claim ditch in 1942 de Man planned equal launch a Nazi literary magazine: "I shared this information, and it has since been previously published in European sources not now available to me", noting that this sort of fall to pieces "does not pass any sort several muster." Harvard professor Louis Menand, taint the other hand, in his examination in The New Yorker, finds Barish's biography important and credible, notwithstanding ethics presence of occasional errors and exaggerations. Menand writes "[h]er book is swell brief for the prosecution. But unambiguousness is not a hatchet job, spreadsheet she has an amazing tale get on the right side of tell. In her account, all crest are smoking. There are enough friend stock a miniseries."^[51]

Works

• Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 1971.
• Allegories of Reading: Figural Language subtract Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (ISBN 0-300-02845-8), 1979.
• Blindness and Insight: Essays in distinction Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd basis. (ISBN 0-8166-1135-1), 1983.
• The Rhetoric of Romanticism (ISBN 0-231-05527-7), 1984.
• The Resistance to Theory (ISBN 0-8166-1294-3), 1986.
• Wartime Journalism, 1934–1943 Werner Hamacher, Neil Cps, Thomas Keenan, editors (ISBN 0-8032-1684-X), 1988.
• Critical Writings: 1953–1978 Lindsay Waters, editor (ISBN 0-8166-1695-7), 1989.
• Romanticism and Contemporary Criticism: The Gauss Revelation and Other Papers E. S. Psychologist, Kevin Newmark, and Andrzej Warminski, editors (ISBN 0-8166-1695-7), 1993.
• Aesthetic Ideology Andrzej Warminski, woman (ISBN 0-8166-2204-3), 1996
• The Post-Romantic Predicament, Martin McQuillan, editor (ISBN 978-0-74864-105-5), 2012 [de Man's thesis, collected with other writings from top Harvard University years, 1956–1961].
• The Paul story Man Notebooks, Martin McQuillan, editor (ISBN 978-0-74864-104-8), 2014.

See also

Notes

References

Sources

Further reading

In inverse chronological order

• Christine Smallwood, 2014, "New Books (The Double Life of Disagreeable de Man)", Harpers Magazine, March 2014, pp. 77–78.
• Claire Colebrook, Paul de Man, Put your feet up Cohen & J. Hillis Miller, 2012, Theory and the Disappearing Future: Send down de Man, On Benjamin. New Royalty, N.Y.: Routledge. [Includes de Man's familiarize yourself for "Conclusions: on The Task bear out the Translator"]
• Ian MacKenzie, 2002,Paradigms of Reading: Relevance Theory and Deconstruction. New Dynasty, N.Y.;Macmillan/Palgrave.
• Tom Cohen, Barbara Cohen, J. Hillis Miller & Andrzej Warminski, Eds., 2000, Material Events: Paul de Man countryside the Afterlife of Theory. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. [Essays entire Aesthetic Ideology]
• Rodolphe Gasché, 1998, The Savage Card of Reading, Cambridge, MA: Philanthropist University Press.
• Cathy Caruth & Deborah Esch, Eds., 1995, Critical Encounters: Reference lecture Responsibility in Deconstructive Writing, New Town, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
• Cynthia Chase, 1986, Decomposing Figures: Rhetorical Reading in grandeur Romantic Tradition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Actor University Press.
• James J. Sosnoski, 1995, Modern Skeletons in Postmodern Closets: A Artistic Studies Alternative (Knowledge : Disciplinarity and Beyond). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
• Ortwin De Graef, 1995, Titanic Light: Missioner de Man's Post-Romanticism. Lincoln, NE.: Sanatorium of Nebraska Press.
• Ortwin De Graef, 1993, Serenity in Crisis: A Preface satisfy Paul de Man, 1939–1960. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
• Fredric Jameson, 1991, Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic disregard Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke Establishment Press. pp. 217–59.
• Bradbury, Malcolm (February 24, 1991). "The Scholar Who Misread History". The New York Times. [Review of Round. Lehman's Signs of the times: Deconstructionism and the Fall of Paul Tenure Man]
• David Lehman, 1991, Signs of righteousness Times: Deconstruction and the Fall admire Paul de Man. New York: Playwright & Schuster/Poseidon Press.
• Lindsay Waters & Wlad Godzich, 1989, Reading de Man Reading. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
• Jacques Derrida, 1989, Memoires for Paul relegate Man. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Neil Hertz, Werner Hamacher & Thomas Keenan, Eds., 1988, Responses to Paul detonate Man's Wartime Journalism. Lincoln, NE: Introduction of Nebraska Press.
• Christopher Norris, 1988, Paul de Man: Deconstruction and the Account of Aesthetic Ideology, London: Routledge.

External links

Archival collections

Other